Opinion | ‘Our Little City’: A Fourth of July Parade Turned Lethal

To the Editor:

Re “Gunfire Tears Right into a Parade Close to Chicago” (entrance web page, July 5):

Effectively, America, it has occurred in our little city. You understand our city, proper? It’s the one persons are sending ideas and prayers to. It’s the city the place individuals say, “We by no means thought this might occur right here.” It’s the secure city with fantastic cops and a way of neighborhood.

It’s the suburban city the place everybody takes their children in pink wagons or on tricycles with streamers to observe the Fourth of July parade. It’s the city the place persons are shot randomly by somebody with a rifle.

We are actually in mourning. It’s now the city the place pundits, who’ve by no means been right here, will rattle swords and shriek to attain factors utilizing useless individuals as chits. My city? It’s your city. It is going to occur once more. Does this sound like freedom to you?

Kevin Tibbles
Highland Park, Unwell.
The author is a former NBC newsman.

To the Editor:

This Independence Day we hung at half-staff two of the six American flags that usually line our driveway yearly. We did this to honor these six lives sacrificed in Highland Park.

Their proper to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness was usurped by the intentional misrepresentation of the Second Modification by a minority of Individuals. Might all those that profess to be pro-life search their souls to look at their stance on gun laws and what being pro-life really means.

Marcella Woodworth
Venice, Fla.

To the Editor:

As Profs. Joseph Blocher and Darrell A.H. Miller level out in “Is a Musket Just like an AR-15?” (Opinion visitor essay, July 2), the Supreme Court docket’s current politicized ruling solely creates confusion.


Civilized states that defend their residents with robust anti-gun rules ought to merely ignore the court docket and reinforce these rules. This can trigger court docket case after court docket case, which may go on for years, perhaps a long time. For all that point their residents can be shielded from the gun crazies. And with luck by then there can be a extra wise Supreme Court docket.

Let’s not overlook the truth that the present interpretation of the Second Modification is a willful misreading. The modification has two components. The primary talks concerning the want for robust state militias — a priority on the time of the modification’s adoption — and the second half, which will depend on the primary, talks about the appropriate of people to personal and bear arms. If the founders had not meant the second half to depend upon the primary, they might not have wanted to incorporate the primary in any respect.

Michael Spielman
Wellfleet, Mass.

To the Editor:

Should every of us lose a cherished one earlier than the gun foyer is stopped?

Robert Davidson
New York

To the Editor:

Re “I’m a New York Metropolis Liberal, and I Desire a Gun,” by Laura E. Adkins (Opinion visitor essay, nytimes.com, June 30):

Ms. Adkins makes the case that she wants a handgun to guard herself from a former companion who has been harassing her. Nonetheless, there are much less deadly choices for shielding oneself, comparable to stun weapons, dwelling safety programs or taking self-defense lessons.

Ms. Adkins states, “And as quickly as I’m able to legally purchase and carry it with out an excessive amount of problem, I stay up for sleeping soundly.” I hope she by no means has to shoot and kill somebody. If she does, she could by no means sleep soundly once more.

Paul R. Brown
Silver Spring, Md.

To the Editor:

Re “Jackson Takes Oath, Changing into First Black Lady on Supreme Court docket” (information article, July 1):

How unhappy that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is taking her place on the Supreme Court docket simply because it has reached such a low level. She definitely deserves significantly better.

It is going to little question be very troublesome for her to serve on a court docket with the bulk fairly keen to undo, with such problematic reasoning, a lot that she has spent her life supporting.

Not solely do they not appear to care about precedents, rights and the ache and even deaths their rulings will trigger, however in addition they appear unconcerned about consistency of their justifications and concerning the embarrassment of citing as an knowledgeable on rights, within the Dobbs resolution, somebody who believed in witches and maintained that they need to be tried and executed.

Maybe they’ve energy and easily don’t fear about what individuals, nationally and internationally, consider them. However I do, and I discover their actions shameful and disgusting.

Linda Bell
Decatur, Ga.
The author is emerita professor of philosophy and director of the Ladies’s Research Institute, Georgia State College.

To the Editor:

Re “Violent Threats Proceed In opposition to Election Staff Regardless of Federal Efforts” (information article, June 30):

Election employees are a spine of our democracy. From county to county, they’re our neighbors, guaranteeing that the voices of this nation are heard. However as detailed in your article, native and state election officers more and more work below threats of violence and endure harassment and abuse. The obvious purpose, even nicely earlier than the autumn midterms, is to get them to throw within the towel on their jobs or bow to stress in different methods.

None of that is good for our democracy. It’s additionally dangerous to the dignity of those employees, who present a civic perform for little or no compensation. These are actually unsafe jobs.

Process forces, just like the federal Election Threats Process Drive, are salutary, however their work must be extremely seen and clear to make sure that reporting mechanisms are recognized, deterrence is superior and penalties are demonstrated.

State and native governments must work in tandem with such efforts and higher assist these civic-minded champions extra broadly. Native media must prioritize reporting these tales. And neighbors must deal with neighbors in ways in which honor the dignity — the inherent worth and price — of one another.

Jeffrey Siminoff
San Francisco
The author is senior vp, office dignity, at Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights.

Supply hyperlink

Previous post EC adopts Public Opinion Ballot Tips – FBC Information
Next post M2 MacBook Air Has Different Laptop computer Makers ‘Apprehensive’ as It Might Negatively Have an effect on Their Product Gross sales